Recently I met with a friend in Melbourne, Derbyshire. It
is a beautiful market town and we met by the church and walked past Melbourne
Hall and The Pool then followed the footpath signs across fields and through
woods on a lovely walk, ending up back in Melbourne a few hours later.
We had a fabulous time, chatting all the way. It was 7th
July 2020 and the coronavirus lockdown was starting to lift, but everyone was
still being cautious. It was such a joy to be out with a friend again enjoying
the English summer at its peak. Did I mention it was raining?
Melbourne Hall |
By the time we had returned to Melbourne we were
soaked and hungry, but the pubs and cafes were still closed. We bought some
sandwiches and tea from a bakery and sheltered from the rain under the
marketplace pavilion. ‘Pavilion’ is maybe not the best description but I am at
a loss. There were 4 benches facing outwards from the stone centre, the marketcross built in 1889, and a roof over us held up by wooden posts on each
corner. We enjoyed sitting in the dry and watching the cars passing by, with a
hot drink and some deep discussions, oblivious to the constant downpour.
It doesn’t resonate with me. Rapid globalisation
has created some big issues for the planet and I think most people recognise
that in the core of their being without spending too much time on the
over-whelming evidence supporting it, when they could be focusing on the solutions. I just don’t accept the ‘we are doomed’
conclusion, which isn’t new and has been pushed for the last 30 years or more. Plus define 'doomed', because it could be anywhere on a scale from a financial recession to extinction, and the most probable outcomes are somewhere between the two.
There is plenty of evidence that indicates doom isn't upon us which I will touch on. I also feel that nothing positive will emerge from that kind of despair. People need hope and there is genuinely a lot to be hopeful for, though I may struggle to get it all in one post, so maybe this is the start of a new series of posts.
There is plenty of evidence that indicates doom isn't upon us which I will touch on. I also feel that nothing positive will emerge from that kind of despair. People need hope and there is genuinely a lot to be hopeful for, though I may struggle to get it all in one post, so maybe this is the start of a new series of posts.
I read a few of Bendell’s blog posts and watched a couple
of youtube videos. I was surprised that one of the proposals was that people
concerned about climate change go through a stage of despair followed by a
stage of prepping for collapse. I have been through those stages, but I always
felt this was a complete anomaly in the UK. Even my friend sitting with me in
the rain, who has supported the climate change movement for at least the last
15 years that I have known her, has not experienced that and we know no one
else who has. If you have then please do get in touch either in response to
this post or by private message to me. For me the stage after prepping is a
deep understanding and knowing that there is a lot of hope and optimism for the
future.
There is no disputing that there are some climate facts
behind Bendell’s work, however I feel there are also some simplifications and a
denial of progress and human nature, which skew his conclusion of collapse. There
is a big difference between fact and theory or projections. Even with regard to
facts they can look different dependent on what side of them you come from
(your natural bias) and of course they can change with time. For instance the
World population is a fact, but the figure changes daily. What I am saying is
that nothing is fact and everything is in flux and in particular anything
predicated on human behaviours and reactions. Experts struggle to predict next
week’s weather, so looking further in the future is unreliable. Anything can
happen today that could change everything tomorrow… and it frequently does.
What I didn’t like about this Deep Adaptation video on youtube is the comment below it that states:
As Dr. Bendell notes, there will be a tendency to want to reject his conclusions in Deep Adaptation since to accept them is so life changing in its repercussions.
My friend took from Bendell that collapse is inevitable,
so stop worrying and spend the remaining years on things that have meaning for
you. The perception being that Collapse means an end of life/ mass extinction
event, rather than an end of a way of life such as a breakdown of current
societal norms. Collapse represents fear, and just the word pulls the mind into
a fear-driven frenzy where logic and reason jump ship and denial seems like a
viable option. So let’s replace ‘Collapse’ with ‘Change’. There will be
changes, there has to be changes in our society and history shows that there
always have been changes.
Tobacco smoke is a killer, and in order to persuade
people to quit smoking every packet has a disturbing image of the damage it has
inflicted on some smokers. It looks pretty scary and if I were a smoker I would
think that I was damned to die of some horrible lung disease or cancer before
too long. The emphasis on the worst case scenario is aimed at scaring people
into changing their smoking habit. For some people it makes the future look
hopeless, so they may as well continue to enjoy smoking as they will be dead
soon anyway. And yet we all know of someone who smoked until they were 80 with
no sign of ill affect at all. How can that be? Maybe that future is not written
in stone?
We are focusing on the worst case scenario for a smoker.
That’s what we are doing with climate change too. This may scare us into
changing our lifestyles or putting legislation in place and on the whole it has
had that effect. However it can also cause people to become paralysed by fear
or believe any efforts are futile. But there are other ways for positive change
to come about and it is far better that we enjoy and embrace those changes because then
they will be changes that are here to last.
I was given a book for Christmas “The Uninhabitable Earth
– A story of the future” by David Wallace-Wells. It’s a shocking title but drew
me in with the promise of an envisioned future. I only made it to page 44 and
the weight of all the depressing, boring facts and figures that were being
driven down to make you feel the full weight of hopelessness was enough. So I
skipped to the back to see what the bright future might look like, but it was
pretty much more of the same. Now if you have more stamina than me and have read
this book in its entirety then please do enlighten me about the good parts that
I have missed, or even shout up just to let me know you have not died of
despair. I am a solutions person. I wanted to find someone who could envision
the future for us and see the solutions - what is the use banging on about the
same old stuff?
Wallace-Wells message is the equivalent of the stark
image of lung cancer on a cigarette pack, I guess I have grown numb to it. Whereas the solutions such as banning
smoking from public spaces worked just as well but without the fear factor. Providing
solutions for people is a lot more empowering than just painting a bleak
picture and leaving them paralysed. Obviously the fear factor is better for
selling books…
Now I don’t deny that there is evidence that looks pretty
bleak for the planet, but that evidence has been around for years. The
Uninhabitable Earth has been compared to the Silent Spring by Rachel Carson
published in 1962 and there has not been a silence regarding environmental
damage in the years in between. I remember the mistake of bringing study
material, Limits to Growth: The 30 Year Update, with me on holiday in 2006 and
I sure felt the despair that Bendell talks about then!
The 30 year update was written in 2004 and the data used
was from the years preceding that, and, well, things change. I think we only
have to look at the growing proportion of renewables in the electricity grid in
the UK to see that things change. Or the consistent tightening of energy
efficiency targets in Building Regulations. Or the energy efficiency labels for
cars, homes and white goods, with the commitments to phase out petrol cars
completely. Standards are consistently being raised and maybe progress has
started slow, but momentum is growing. The growth in
globalisation completely over-shadowed the gains made until recently, and now there
are more and more positive reports emerging. It’s clear that our perceptions
and understandings of where we are need to change constantly and be open to the
improvements we see, not just the devastation being caused.
World fertility rates (births per woman), The World Bank, |
Birth rate is a clear area where the actual changes have to be taken by individuals. Yes education and access to contraception are vital to enable that, but couples have chosen to move away from the large families of their parents and grandparents. Who would have thought it was possible to change that on a global scale?
The coronavirus pandemic predictions were bleak in the UK. Maybe they needed to be to prod our slow and bumbling government into action. However the 250,000 – 510,000 deaths predicted for the UK on the 16th March by Neil Ferguson's Imperial College team were based on the worst case scenario. That worst case scenario may have been fairly accurate
based on the information available at the time and the assumptions made. Those
assumptions can make an enormous difference. That’s why there will be several
scenarios run for different assumptions. The worst case is the do nothing
scenario, the best case is that all infections are tracked and everything is under
control, which was equally as unlikely in the UK as the worst case, however not
totally impossible.
It is the same with the impacts of climate change, there
is a range of ‘likely’ outcomes based on how much or little action is taken to
reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the impact. My concern is that human
nature seems to be misunderstood in modelling and some of the positive changes
happening now are overlooked.
Most of the constructs which govern our society and
dictate the actions of the majority are beliefs, traditions or habits. For
instance families were large because they were for our ancestors and our
neighbours, because there was and still is a belief perpetuated by religion
that contraception is bad and because people weren’t educated on the choices
they had or choices weren’t widely available. The barriers that needed to be
broken weren’t physical (although it all came down to a physical barrier at the
basic level J).
Back to coronavirus, the decision of when to lockdown and
how far to go, was a human one that made a significant difference on the
overall impact of the virus. If you were calculating this based on monetary costs
alone then you would not expect a lockdown to be implemented, because the
economic risk was enormous and the probability of stopping the virus spreading
seemed slim. Those most at risk were the weak and frail members, not the
productive worker members of society. Boris Johnson certainly preferred the do
nothing approach to start with, talking about ‘herd immunity’.
However this was out of kilter with the rest of human
nature, which is to protect and care for loved ones. Many companies had already
started to voluntarily shut down offices and ask their staff to work from home
a few weeks prior to the government instigated lockdown. The pressure for the
government to act on behalf of society was immense and of course they had to go
with it. So who would you say made the decision in the end? Was it the
politicians or was it forced by public opinion? Where does the power really
lie?
Whilst there are some people who did not stick to the
lockdown rules, the vast majority did. The vast majority have tried to take
care of themselves, their loved ones and their community by following
government advice, however confusing and pointless some of it seemed at times.
This human effect has made a difference. This community response has shifted
the outcome away from the worst case prediction. The power of this human
response and its influence on decision-makers was under-rated. Similarly Bendell
and others mistakenly believe that the natural instinct for humans is to
protect only themselves at all costs, but it never has been. We are social
animals.
When I read The 5 Stages of Collapse by Dmitry Orlov he
discussed a tribe that had lost this community instinct to protect others. It
was most disturbing to read of parents with no regard for their off-spring and
the extreme conditions that had brought this shift in culture about. It is an
anomaly that is so alien to our current culture. I can understand that writing
in the age of Brexit the feeling of division and disdain for others was at its
peak. However the lockdown has brought a blossoming of communities, just as
social interaction and national pride were buoyant during the 2012 Olympics and
Queen’s Jubilee celebrations. We can choose whether we foster and promote
feelings of despair, isolation and fear of others OR encourage community spirit
and camaraderie. I know which I prefer.
Another very positive change for the future is the new
generation. My climate change fear years were during a time when the Baby
Boomers were the dominant decision makers, with their focus on growth. Now 20 years
later it is my generation that are taking up the reigns and the focus has moved more to sustainability and there has been a shift in gear.
In 20 years’ time the decisions will be made by a new generation who have lived through lockdown, protested
for Black Lives Matter and get their news from social media, rather than
mainstream media. Growth at all costs will no longer be on the agenda. I
could argue that we are already there, as for most of the world growth has
been demoted and saving lives has become far more important when faced with a pandemic. Money is bailing
out people and businesses not financial intuitions – that’s an incredible shift away from
austerity.
Most of the solutions we need to transition to a low carbon
sustainable lifestyle are already available. Many are underway and building up momentum.
Just like the shift seen in population growth, individual change is not only
possible but is in motion. Your choices have made it so. As shown with lockdown, the people have immense power to instigate the changes needed and are
already surging ahead of government legislation.
Over the next few posts I will write you that positive future that I know to be true, with examples of low carbon successes.
Over the next few posts I will write you that positive future that I know to be true, with examples of low carbon successes.